Clickable Advertisement
GST vs SST: Which tax system is better?
By Nabil Fakrullah Ridzuwan
August 30, 2025
Introduction
The debate between the Goods and Services Tax (GST) and the Sales and Services Tax (SST) remains a central issue in Malaysia’s fiscal policy. Both systems serve as mechanisms for government revenue collection, but their structures, economic impacts, and implications for consumers and businesses differ significantly. Determining which system is “better” requires examining their principles, efficiency, equity, and effects on the economy.
Understanding GST and SST
Goods and Services Tax (GST)
GST is a value-added tax (VAT) implemented on goods and services at every stage of the supply chain, from production to consumption. Businesses collect GST on sales and claim input tax credits on purchases, ensuring that tax is only paid on the value added at each stage.
Key features of GST:
Broad-based and multi-stage.
Input tax credit mechanism prevents tax-on-tax (cascading effect).
Transparent, as consumers see the tax component on receipts.
Sales and Services Tax (SST)
SST is a single-stage tax comprising two components:
1. Sales Tax: Imposed on manufacturers at the point of production or importation.
2. Service Tax: Imposed on specific services provided by businesses, such as restaurants, hotels, and professional services.
Key features of SST:
Narrower scope compared to GST.
No input tax credit, leading to possible cascading tax effects.
Consumers often do not see the exact breakdown of tax in the final price.
Advantages and Disadvantages
GST Advantages
Broad Tax Base: Covers more goods and services, providing a stable and higher source of government revenue.
Transparency: Tax is clearly itemized on invoices, increasing accountability.
Efficiency: Eliminates double taxation due to the input tax credit system.
Global Standard: Widely adopted in over 160 countries, making it familiar to investors.
GST Disadvantages
Inflationary Pressure: Introduction or reintroduction often leads to a rise in living costs.
Administrative Burden: Requires businesses to maintain detailed records and submit regular returns.
Regressive Impact: Lower-income households may feel the burden more as GST applies broadly, though exemptions and zero-rated items can mitigate this.
SST Advantages
Simplicity: Easier to administer for both businesses and government due to narrower scope.
Lower Visibility: Consumers may perceive it as less burdensome since the tax is not always explicitly shown.
Targeted Coverage: Only applies to selected goods and services.
SST Disadvantages
Narrow Tax Base: Generates less revenue for the government compared to GST.
Cascading Effect: Since no input tax credit exists, tax may accumulate along the supply chain, potentially increasing final prices in a non-transparent manner.
Less Efficient: Does not capture all economic activities, potentially creating loopholes and uneven taxation.
Which System Is Better?
From a purely economic perspective, GST is more efficient, transparent, and sustainable. It broadens the government’s revenue base and aligns with global tax practices, making it attractive for long-term fiscal stability. However, its implementation must be accompanied by measures to protect low-income households, such as targeted subsidies and exemptions for essential goods.
On the other hand, SST is politically more palatable due to its simplicity and lower visibility, but it is less effective in generating revenue and may distort prices due to cascading taxes.
Conclusion
The choice between GST and SST is not merely a technical matter but also a political and social one. GST provides greater efficiency and transparency, making it a stronger long-term solution for national revenue. However, its regressive nature requires careful policy design to ensure fairness. SST, while simpler, is less robust and may not meet the demands of a growing economy.
Ultimately, the “better” system depends on balancing fiscal needs with public acceptance. A well-designed GST, complemented by social safety nets, would likely serve Malaysia’s economic future more effectively than the current SST system.